How Flying Works

The Evolution of the Jet Engine, From Whittle to the Open Fan

Every jet engine hanging under a wing today is the answer to the same single question, asked and re-answered roughly every fifteen years since the 1930s: how do you push more air, more efficiently, through the same basic machine? That question has a real, surprisingly dramatic history — two rival inventors who never met, a fighter that arrived four years too late to matter, an engine programme saved from cancellation by two weeks, and a technology now being bet on again, in the open, for the decade ahead.

Two inventors, working in secret, on opposite sides of a war neither engine helped win

The jet engine has two fathers who never knew about each other until after the fact. In Britain, RAF officer Frank Whittle patented the turbojet in 1930 and spent years struggling to get anyone to take it seriously — funding was scarce, and it wasn’t until 1937 that his first test rig, the Whittle Unit, actually ran. In Germany, Hans von Ohain arrived at essentially the same underlying idea completely independently, formulating his own theory of jet propulsion in 1933 while still a doctoral student at the University of Göttingen. Neither man had any idea the other existed. What decided who got there first wasn’t the idea — it was industrial backing: von Ohain partnered with the Heinkel aircraft company, and on 27 August 1939, days before the Second World War began, the Heinkel He 178 became the first aircraft in history to fly under pure jet power. Whittle’s own aircraft, the Gloster E.28/39, didn’t fly until May 1941 — nearly two years behind, entirely because Whittle had spent the 1930s trying to convince Britain to fund something that sounded, to most people who heard the pitch, like science fiction.

The Gloster E.28/39, Britain's first jet aircraft
The Gloster E.28/39 — the aircraft that finally proved Whittle's turbojet design in the air, in May 1941, nearly two years after von Ohain's engine had already flown in Germany. Photo: Alan Wilson — CC BY-SA 2.0

The engine that actually went to war

Neither Whittle’s nor von Ohain’s original engine ever saw combat. That distinction belongs to a third, genuinely different design: the Junkers Jumo 004, an axial-flow turbojet developed by Junkers under Anselm Franz, architecturally distinct from Whittle’s centrifugal-flow layout — and it’s the axial-flow layout, not Whittle’s, that became the template nearly every jet engine since has followed. Paired to the Messerschmitt Me 262, the Jumo 004 powered the world’s first operational jet fighter into combat in 1944, roughly 100mph faster than any Allied piston fighter it met. It arrived too late and in too few numbers to change the outcome of the war — production was hammered by Allied bombing and chronic shortages of the heat-resistant alloys the engine’s turbine blades needed — but it proved, under genuine combat conditions, that the axial-flow jet engine was the design worth building on.

A Junkers Jumo 004 engine, as fitted to the Messerschmitt Me 262
A Junkers Jumo 004 — the axial-flow architecture that became the template for essentially every jet engine built since, civil or military. Photo: Nick-D — CC BY-SA 4.0

From wartime secret to airline seat

Commercial jet travel began in 1952, when the de Havilland Comet entered service — a genuine technological leap that cut journey times dramatically, and a programme that was then badly damaged by a string of fatal crashes traced to metal fatigue around the Comet’s square window frames, a lesson in structural engineering the entire industry absorbed. The aircraft that actually built the commercial jet age at scale was the Boeing 707, powered by Pratt & Whitney’s JT3D — not a pure turbojet like the Jumo 004 or Whittle’s engines, but an early, low-bypass turbofan: some of the incoming air was now deliberately routed around the engine core rather than through it, a small first step toward the idea that would define every engine generation after it — that bypassing more air, rather than accelerating a smaller amount harder, was the real path to a better engine.

Pratt & Whitney JT3D engines fitted to a Boeing 707
Pratt & Whitney JT3D engines on a Boeing 707 — an early low-bypass turbofan, the first step away from the pure turbojet.

The idea taken seriously: high bypass, and the widebody it made possible

The real break came in the late 1960s, when Pratt & Whitney committed to a high-bypass turbofan on a scale nobody had attempted commercially: the JT9D, developed specifically for an aircraft that didn’t exist yet — the Boeing 747, covered in full in this site’s own 747 story. Rather than pushing a relatively small volume of air through the core at very high speed, the JT9D pushed a much larger volume of air around the core at a comparatively gentler speed for the same thrust — quieter, and meaningfully more fuel-efficient, precisely because moving more air slower is aerodynamically cheaper than moving less air faster. The JT9D entered service on the 747 in January 1970 and went on to power the 767, Airbus A300 and A310, and the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 — the engine that proved high bypass wasn’t just theoretically better, it was the engine an entire generation of widebody aircraft would be built around. General Electric followed close behind with the CF6, first run in 1971 and derived directly from the TF39 GE had built for the military’s C-5 Galaxy transport — a rare, genuine case of military engine technology flowing straight into civil aviation rather than the more usual direction.

A Pratt & Whitney JT9D engine, the first high-bypass turbofan
A preserved Pratt & Whitney JT9D — the first high-bypass turbofan, launched specifically for the Boeing 747. Photo: Alf van Beem — CC0

Two weeks from cancellation: the engine that became the most common ever built

Not every engine that mattered arrived through triumph. CFM International — a 50/50 joint venture between GE and France’s Snecma, formed in 1974 — ran its first CFM56 that same year and then spent more than five years unable to sell a single one. By March 1979, the programme was two weeks from official cancellation. What saved it wasn’t a design breakthrough; it was three airlines — Delta, United and Flying Tigers — choosing the CFM56 to re-engine their ageing Douglas DC-8 fleets, followed within weeks by a US Air Force order to re-engine its KC-135 tanker fleet with the same design. Boeing, meanwhile, had spent that same period trying and failing to sell airlines on a CFM56-re-engined 707 to meet tightening noise regulations — an irony the engine’s own history carries: the aircraft it was originally pitched to save couldn’t save it, and a completely different aircraft did. From that near-death, the CFM56 went on to become the default engine of the Boeing 737 Classic/NG and Airbus A320ceo families — two of the best-selling airliners ever built — and with more than 20,000 produced, it remains the single most common jet engine in the world by a wide margin.

A CFM56 engine mounted below the wing of an Airbus A320
A CFM56 under the wing of a Lufthansa A320 — the engine most air travelers have flown behind without ever learning its name. Photo: Olivier Cleynen — CC BY 4.0

The next real architectural break: letting the fan think for itself

For four decades after the JT9D, every high-bypass turbofan shared one structural limitation: the fan and the low-pressure turbine driving it were bolted to the same shaft, spinning at the same speed — forcing a compromise, since a fan wants to turn slowly for efficiency while a turbine wants to spin fast for power. Pratt & Whitney’s geared turbofan, the PW1000G family, finally broke that constraint by inserting a reduction gearbox between the two, letting each spin at its own genuine optimum speed for the first time. The payoff was real and verified, not marketing: bypass ratios above 12:1, a roughly 12–15% improvement in fuel burn, and up to 50% quieter than the direct-drive engines it replaced — the engine now flying under the wing of every Airbus A220 and most A320neo-family aircraft.

A Pratt & Whitney PW1000G geared turbofan engine on display
A Pratt & Whitney PW1000G — the geared-turbofan architecture that let the fan and turbine each spin at their own optimum speed for the first time. Photo: Zenwort — CC BY-SA 4.0

What comes after the geared turbofan

The next real break is already in flight testing, and it’s a stranger-looking machine than anything before it: CFM’s RISE programme strips away the fan cowling entirely, exposing the blades in an open-rotor configuration to push bypass ratio — and efficiency — further than a shrouded fan physically allows, aiming for entry into service around the mid-2030s. It isn’t flying passengers yet, and it won’t for years. It’s real enough, though, that GE’s own newsroom put out a piece specifically explaining why Mentour Pilot — Petter Hörnfeldt, one of the most-watched airline pilots on YouTube — has become a public partner in explaining the programme to a general audience, a genuine sign of how seriously the manufacturers are treating the communication challenge of an engine that looks, on first glance, like something has gone missing.

The sequence

The bypass-ratio arc, generation by generation

1

Whittle & von Ohain

1930–1939

Two independent inventions. Von Ohain's Heinkel He 178 flies first, Aug 1939 — Whittle's Gloster E.28/39 follows in May 1941.

2

Junkers Jumo 004

1944

Powers the Me 262, the first operational jet fighter. Sets the axial-flow template nearly every engine since has followed.

3

Pratt & Whitney JT9D

entered service 1970

The first high-bypass turbofan to power a widebody — launched the Boeing 747, then the 767, A300, A310 and DC-10.

4

General Electric CF6

first run 1971

Derived from the military TF39, GE's answer to the widebody high-bypass era.

5

CFM56

saved March 1979

Two weeks from cancellation, saved by DC-8 re-engine orders. Now the most-produced jet engine family ever — 20,000+ built.

6

PW1000G Geared Turbofan

current generation

A reduction gearbox lets the fan spin independently of the turbine, enabling bypass ratios above 12:1 — verified ~12-15% better fuel burn, up to ~50% quieter.

7

CFM RISE (open fan)

targeting mid-2030s

Removes the fan cowling entirely for the next major efficiency step — not yet in service, and the program Mentour Pilot has publicly partnered with to help explain.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did bypass ratio become the whole story of jet engine progress?

Because a pure turbojet accelerates a small amount of air to very high speed — powerful but loud and thirsty. A high-bypass turbofan instead accelerates a much larger amount of air to a lower speed for the same thrust, which is both quieter and dramatically more fuel-efficient. Every major leap since the 1970s — the JT9D, CF6, CFM56, and now the geared turbofan — is fundamentally the same idea pushed to a higher bypass ratio.

What actually changed with the geared turbofan?

Earlier high-bypass engines connected the fan directly to the same shaft as the low-pressure turbine, forcing a compromise between the fan's ideal (slow) speed and the turbine's ideal (fast) speed. A reduction gearbox lets each spin at its own optimum speed, which is what allowed Pratt & Whitney's PW1000G family to reach bypass ratios above 12:1 — a real, verified 12-15% fuel burn improvement over the direct-drive engines it replaced.

Is the "next" engine already flying?

Not yet in commercial service. CFM (the GE/Safran joint venture behind the CFM56) is developing the RISE program — an open-fan/open-rotor design that removes the fan cowling entirely for another major efficiency leap, aiming for entry into service around the mid-2030s. Mentour Pilot has publicly partnered with the program to help explain it, which GE's own newsroom covered directly.

Why do some manufacturers still build low-bypass military engines?

Bypass ratio is a trade-off, not a strict "higher is better" scale — low-bypass engines still deliver the raw thrust-to-size and high-speed performance military fighters need, where a wide, high-bypass civilian-style fan would create too much drag.

How close did the CFM56 — the world's most common jet engine — come to never existing?

Genuinely close. Its parent programme had run for more than five years without a single order and was two weeks from official cancellation in March 1979 when Delta, United and Flying Tigers picked it to re-engine their DC-8s, followed within weeks by a US Air Force order to re-engine the KC-135 tanker fleet. More than 20,000 CFM56s have been built since.